<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Allegedly inconsistent knowledge principles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanichikawa.net/weblog/allegedly-inconsistent-knowledge-principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanichikawa.net/weblog/allegedly-inconsistent-knowledge-principles/</link>
	<description>Jonathan Ichikawa's website</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 20:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniele</title>
		<link>http://jonathanichikawa.net/weblog/allegedly-inconsistent-knowledge-principles/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanichikawa.net/?p=81#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Hi Jonathan
 I have read the paper some time ago. Doesn't Weiner have some more cases? it seems your worries about this argument are well motivated.
 I thought the role of the Disquotation Principle was to rule out contextualism, which would be an obvious way to avoid inconsistency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jonathan<br />
 I have read the paper some time ago. Doesn&#8217;t Weiner have some more cases? it seems your worries about this argument are well motivated.<br />
 I thought the role of the Disquotation Principle was to rule out contextualism, which would be an obvious way to avoid inconsistency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
